3K free SVG icons for popular brands
(simpleicons.org)201 points by noashavit 6 hours ago | 46 comments
201 points by noashavit 6 hours ago | 46 comments
KTibow 2 hours ago | root | parent |
Simple Icons is an icon pack on Iconify
26 minutes ago | prev | next |
ArcaneMoose 4 hours ago | prev | next |
Don't tell the guy who paid $70k for icons about this!
spoonfeeder006 2 hours ago | root | parent | next |
And don't tell them about the browser inspector nor how to copy SVG code using that
Brajeshwar 2 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
What is the story? URL to read? (Search resulted in another CEO's $70K salary thing.)
Is this like Pepsi’s Million Dollar logo redesign?
ec109685 2 hours ago | root | parent | next |
It’s quite the saga, including the designer putting in their portfolio that they actually completed the project as they were ghosting their client: https://x.com/Shpigford/status/1807802947394588842
dgfitz 42 minutes ago | root | parent | next |
$5.00/image. The math on that is absurd unless the artist is cranking what, 20 images an hour?
Feels like they thought they had an edge, probably an LLM, and it didn’t work out.
Also feels like it took $70k to generate 14,000 requirements, or the SOW is actually shit and this is all a disaster.
Disclaimer: I don’t read twitter, if all this was spelled out in the link I apologize
spoonfeeder006 2 hours ago | root | parent | prev |
So what, he was asking the designer to re-create already existing icons? Or brand new icons for each stock?
Thats insanely fucked up either way of the designer leading them on like that or to ultimately cheat someone
cyral 44 minutes ago | root | parent |
Re-create existing icons, since a lot of these icon packs are not very standardized (e.g. some icons are full logos, some are actual icons, some have borders, some have backgrounds, etc).
Here is a good tweet from another company on why they made their own logos: https://mobile.x.com/tcosta_co/status/1808174493170344345
2 hours ago | root | parent | prev |
below43 3 hours ago | root | parent | prev |
Came here for this comment.
phkahler 5 hours ago | prev | next |
Seems like a lot of trademark infringement suits about to come their way. Am I mistaken or is there no way this viable? In addition, nobody has any legal right to put others trademarks (use these) on anything without the trademark owners permission. So even if the site and distribution is somehow OK, nobody can really use them anyway. Right?
tialaramex 3 hours ago | root | parent | next |
You're mostly fine unless you are confusing consumers. The purpose of these marks is exactly to avoid that, so you're going to get into a lot of trouble if you use the marks to mislead people in any way.
Take the Air China logo - if a not-so-bright reader might think you are Air China, you're using this all wrong. But if you use an Air China logo to signify the routes actually flown by Air China on a free world map of international flights on your web site, well, yeah, that's Air China, nobody is misled, even a moron knows the little logos on your map of the world aren't actually jet aeroplanes.
duxup 3 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
I'm not sure if simply offering a brand's logo would be trademark infringement.
Years ago someone contacted me at the company I worked for claiming in some sorta pseudo legal language that we couldn't have one of our competitor's logos on our website. We had it on a promotional page comparing features across similar products.
Turns out we can do that in the US.
benatkin 5 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
These and others have been online for a while, so I doubt it. There's more here, under the Brands / Social category: https://icones.js.org/
Yes, there are ways someone could use them that would not only run afoul of the trademark, but have trademark holders come after them. However, that doesn't make this useless, because there are proper and gray-area uses of these as well.
diggan 4 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
Font Awesome been available since 2013 at least, featuring brand icons https://web.archive.org/web/20130608045113/http://fontawesom...
Seems fine
duxup 4 hours ago | root | parent |
I always assumed Font Awesome had some business agreement with those orgs eventually as font awesome did charge for some of their icons IIRC.
Having said that, I'm not sure even that is legally necessary.
strogonoff 3 hours ago | root | parent |
I imagine avoiding IP legal issues with things like icons could be less about signing agreements with all involved companies and more about having a team that can respond professionally to an inquiry.
Businesses may often not really understand what’s going on and default to being worried about third-party use of their trademarks that they normally must defend. Perhaps they don’t need to worry in this case, where it may actually provide a bit of free advertisement, but if there’s no one on the other side then it wouldn’t help the case.
IANAL
audiodude 3 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
It's not trademark infringement to copy or display a logo. Trademark infringement happens when you confuse customers by using a logo or phrase and make them think that you're selling the actual product or that you're somehow endorsed by the original company.
anticorporate 5 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
They probably each carry their own licensing and terms of use. I'd suspect there's a good number where reuse in some situations would be permitted, and in others would not. But every single one is going to be different, and just making assumptions is a quick way to blindly assume enormous legal liability.
aniviacat 5 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
I assume most brands are happy to see their icons being used/shared on as many platforms as possible. It's just free advertisment.
If someone uses them in a context that's actually problematic for the brand, the brand can still sue them then. But that won't be the common case.
ashu1461 5 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
You can usually use the assets which are available on the official website, example for meta it is https://about.meta.com/brand/resources/facebook/logo/.
If you see the official logo it has different colors than the one provided in the website, so you can't that for production use cases.
ChrisMarshallNY 3 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |
Supplying the assets is not a problem. Most stock art orgs have brands. I suspect that they can get into "gray areas," if they charge for it.
Using them is the problematic part.
vultour 4 hours ago | root | parent | prev |
It has existed for years and they actively remove icons when they get a takedown request. I'm sure most companies other than Oracle are happy to be there.
qingcharles 2 hours ago | prev | next |
I use these for everything, I've even corrected a couple of them as sites tend to tweak their logos all the time:
albert_e 3 hours ago | prev | next |
Surprisingly - No Microsoft logos. (Windows, Office, Azure, ...)
KTibow an hour ago | root | parent |
Looks like the legal team reached out and said that making monochrome icons isn't allowed [0]
0: https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons/issues/11236
BizyDev 16 minutes ago | root | parent |
That's really a shitty move from MS. But, technically, since they're still in the commit history, you can retrieve them for personnal/private use.
keyle 4 hours ago | prev | next |
I find it amusing because in the past, I would have used this to find the logo of the company that I'd work for at the time.
I wonder how many employees of said brands will use this rather than their corporate environment to find an svg asset!
al_borland an hour ago | root | parent | next |
I’ve done this. The internal brand center was focused mostly on sales and people interfacing with customers.
I was using it for internal tools though. I’m sure if I made customer facing sites I would need to go through more official channels and make sure all the branding guidelines are followed to the letter.
8n4vidtmkvmk an hour ago | root | parent | prev |
Wish they'd make an SVG for my business! Hah
TRiG_Ireland 2 hours ago | prev | next |
The first one I downloaded (RTÉ colour) is an invalid SVG file.
Incidentally, what is the third icon on the home page, /e/? There's a name impossible to google.
rascul 2 hours ago | root | parent |
> Incidentally, what is the third icon on the home page, /e/? There's a name impossible to google.
NewJazz 2 hours ago | root | parent |
So degoogled you can't even google them!
anamexis 3 hours ago | prev | next |
The site is broken for me on Safari (Mac), works in Chrome.
bickett 2 hours ago | prev | next |
Oh that's great, I'm always looking for logos for apps
8n4vidtmkvmk 44 minutes ago | root | parent |
Is this sarcasm? This seems like an uncommon thing to want.
astrowilliam 4 hours ago | prev | next |
I did not expect to see AEW (All Elite Wrestling) on the list.
rathboma 4 hours ago | prev | next |
Automatic like for including Beekeeper Studio :-D.
mattigames an hour ago | prev | next |
Doesn't have pornhub or Brazzers, not even logo SVG archiving escapes the tentacles of the moral police (keep in mind pornhub it's one of the top 10 most visited sites in the world)
motoxpro an hour ago | root | parent |
Also no Microsoft logos (top two biggest companies in the world). The moral police are out of control! /s
mattigames 44 minutes ago | root | parent |
Except I actually looked for the other top 10 most popular websites before making my comment, they are all there (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, et al), as you may know Microsoft.com doesn't even make it to the top 100
txtsd 4 hours ago | prev | next |
Just what I needed today. Thank you!
lovegrenoble 4 hours ago | prev | next |
Alternatively: https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons
ThrowawayTestr 5 hours ago | prev |
Doesn't have Grindr, disappointing.
danielvaughn 2 hours ago | next |
I just don't see the need for sites like this, given that Iconify exists: https://icon-sets.iconify.design
They probably have >90% of all the logos contained on simpleicons, along with nearly any other icon you could ever want or need.